[1]陈新月.影响学校数字能力和转型的因素研究[J].大众科技,2023,25(12):181-185.
 Research on the Factors Influencing Digital Ability and Transformation in Schools[J].Popular Science & Technology,2023,25(12):181-185.
点击复制

影响学校数字能力和转型的因素研究()
分享到:

《大众科技》[ISSN:1008-1151/CN:45-1235/N]

卷:
25
期数:
2023年12
页码:
181-185
栏目:
社会科学研究
出版日期:
2023-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Factors Influencing Digital Ability and Transformation in Schools
作者:
陈新月
(广西师范大学,广西 桂林 541006)
关键词:
数字技术学校数字能力和转型影响因素
Keywords:
digital technology digital ability and transformation in schools influencing factors
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在线教学的兴起加速了数字技术在教育中的应用,一些学校因缺乏经验和数字能力较低,出现了一系列教学问题。数字技术是推进教育数字化转型的关键,对学校教育质量的发展起着至关重要的作用。文章基于数字技术视角,对影响学校数字能力和转型的因素进行研究。研究表明,数字技术对教育具有五个层面的影响,其中影响数字技术整合的因素包括数字能力,教师的个人特征和专业发展,以及学校的领导和管理、行政、基础设施等。学校的信息技术整合不仅影响学生的表现,还影响其他利益相关者,在高校数字化转型过程中发挥着重要的作用。
Abstract:
The rise of Online teaching has accelerated the application of digital technology in education, and some colleges and universities have encountered a series of teaching problems due to lack of experience and low digital capabilities. Digital technology is the key to promoting the digital transformation of education and plays a crucial role in the development of colleges and universities education quality. The article is based on the perspective of digital technology to study the factors that affect the digital capabilities and transformation of schools. Research has shown that digital technology has five levels of impact on education, among which the factors that affect digital technology integration include digital capabilities, personal characteristics and professional development of teachers, as well as leadership and management, administration, infrastructure, etc. The integration of information technology in colleges and universities not only affects the performance of students, but also affects other stakeholders, playing an important role in the digital transformation process of colleges and universities.

参考文献/References:

[1] ΒLASK?Z, DA COSTA P, SCHNEPF S V. Learning losses and educational inequalities in Europe: Mapping the potential consequences of the COVID-19 crisis[J]. Journal of European Social Policy, 2022, 32(4): 361-375.[2] PETTERSSON F. Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2021, 26(1): 187-204.[3] 祝智庭,胡姣. 教育数字化转型的本质探析与研究展望[J]. 中国电化教育,2022(4): 1-8,25.[4] 黄荣怀. 加快教育数字化转型 推动学校高质量发展[J].人民教育,2022(15): 28-32.[5] 刘三女牙,郝晓晗,李卿. 教育数字化转型的中国道路[J]. 中国电化教育,2023(1): 52-61.[6] BALANSKAT A, BLAMIRE R, KEFALA S. The ICT impact report: a review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe[R]. Brussels: European Commission, 2006.[7] TAMIM R M, BERNARD R M, BOROKHOVSKI E, et al. What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: a second-order meta-analysis and validation study[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2011, 81(1): 4-28. [8] FU J S. ICT in education: A critical literature review and its implications[J]. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 2013, 9(1): 112-125.[9] ZHENG B, WARSCHAUER M, LIN C H, et al. Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: a meta-analysis and research synthesis[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2016, 86(4): 1052-1084. [10] PAN Y, KE F, XU X. A systematic review of the role of learning games in fostering mathematics education in K-12 settings[J]. Educational Research Review, 2022, 36: 100448. [11] MARTINEZ L, GIMENES M, LAMBERT E. Entertainment video games for academic learning: A systematic review[J]. Journal of Educational Computing, 2022, 60(1): 3848.[12] GARZ? J, KINSHUK, BALDIRIS S, et al. How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A Meta-analysis and research synthesis[J]. Educational Research Review, 2020, 31: 100334.[13] COBAN M, BOLAT Y I, GOKSU I. The potential of immersive virtual reality to enhance learning: a meta-analysis[J]. Educational Research Review, 2022, 36: 100452.[14] SU J H, YANG W P. Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: a scoping review[J]. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 3: 100049. [15] 李锋,顾小清,程亮,等. 教育数字化转型的政策逻辑、内驱动力与推进路径[J]. 开放教育研究,2022,28(4): 93-101.[16] SCHWABE A, LIND F, KOSCH L, et al. No negative effects of reading on screen on comprehension of narrative texts compared to print: A Meta-analysis[J]. Media Psychology, 2022, 25(2): 779-796.[17] KOH C. A qualitative Meta-analysis on the use of serious games to support learners with intellectual and developmental disabilities: What we know, what we need to know and what we can do[J]. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 2022, 69(3): 919-950.[18] ISTENIC STARCIC A, BAGON S. ICT-supported learning for inclusion of people with special needs: Review of seven educational technology journals, 1970-2011[J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 45(2): 202-230. [19] ARZTMANN M, HORNSTRA L, JEURING J, et al. Effects of games in STEM education: a meta-analysis on the moderating role of student background characteristics[J]. Studies in Science Education, 2023, 59(1): 109-145. [20] BADO N. Game-based learning pedagogy: A review of the literature[J]. Interactive Learning Environments, 2022, 30(5): 936-948.[21] PUNIE Y. A review of the impact of ICT on learning [EB/OL]. (2006-01-16)[2022-12-23]. http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/ 7pc/doc/1224678677_jrc47246n.pdf.[22] ESCUETA M, QUAN V, NICKOW A J, et al. Education technology: an evidence-based review[J]. NBER Working Papers, 2017, 8: 23744.[23] REDEP N B. Comparative overview of the digital preparedness of education systems in selected CEE countries[D]. Vienna: Central European University, 2021.

相似文献/References:

[1]兰孝玲.漫话新媒体艺术与现代生活[J].大众科技,2019,21(04):112.
 New Media Art and Modern Life[J].Popular Science & Technology,2019,21(12):112.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2023-02-27【作者简介】陈新月(1999-),女,四川广安人,广西师范大学教育学部在读硕士研究生,研究方向为教育技术学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-05