[1]李承蔚 李智斐 钟远鸣 黄保华 莫 怡 梁渊耀蒙纪文 梁钦秋 杨 尹.内镜下经椎板间入路腰椎减压融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症[J].大众科技,2023,25(9):65-69.
 Endoscopic Lumbar Interlaminar Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis[J].Popular Science & Technology,2023,25(9):65-69.
点击复制

内镜下经椎板间入路腰椎减压融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症()
分享到:

《大众科技》[ISSN:1008-1151/CN:45-1235/N]

卷:
25
期数:
2023年9
页码:
65-69
栏目:
医药与卫生
出版日期:
2023-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Endoscopic Lumbar Interlaminar Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
作者:
李承蔚1 李智斐2 钟远鸣2 黄保华2 莫 怡2 梁渊耀1蒙纪文1 梁钦秋1 杨 尹1
(1.广西中医药大学,广西 南宁 530001;2.广西中医药大学第一附属医院,广西 南宁 530000)
关键词:
腰椎滑脱症内窥镜经椎板间入路腰椎减压融合术
Keywords:
lumbar spondylolisthesis endoscope translaminar approach lumbar decompression and fusion
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨内镜下经椎板间入路腰椎减压融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效。方法:采用全内镜下经椎板间入路腰椎减压融合术治疗25例单节段腰椎轻度滑脱的患者。记录手术操作过程、术后并发症等情况,术后1、3、6个月随访时记录腰痛及腿痛VAS评分、椎间隙高度以ODI指数,术后6个月记录椎体滑脱率、滑脱角、JOA评分,对比术前指标以评估疗效。结果:手术时间61~122 min,术中透视5~11次,术中出血量为52~110 mL,术后引流量64~116 mL,术后切口愈合良好,未出现明显感染,术后未出现严重并发症。术后1个月、3个月、末次随访(即术后6个月随访)时的腰痛、腿痛VAS评分均低于术前(P<0.05)。末次随访时所测得的椎体滑脱率、滑脱角以及JOA评分均优于治疗前,各个时间点测得指标同术前指标差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:内镜下经椎板间入路腰椎融合术能在较安全的基础上实现充分的神经根减压、椎体间融合,显著改善患者腰椎滑脱所导致的腰腿痛症状及功能障碍,手术疗效较好。
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of endoscopic lumbar interlaminar decompression and fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: 25 patients with single segmental lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated by total endoscopic lumbar interlaminar decompression and fusion. The operation process and postoperative complications were recorded. VAS scores, intervertebral height and ODI index were recorded for lumbago and leg pain at 1, 3 and 6 months after the operation. Vertebral spondylolisthesis rate, spondylolisthesis Angle and JOA score were recorded at 6 months after the operation. The preoperative indexes were compared to evaluate the curative effect. Results: The operation time was 61 to 122 min, the intraoperative fluoroscopy was 5 to 11 times, the intraoperative blood loss was about 52 to 110mL, the postoperative drainage volume was 64 to 116mL, the postoperative incision healed well, there was no obvious infection, and no serious postoperative complications occurred. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain at 1 month, 3 months and the last follow-up (6 months after operation) were lower than those before operation (P<0.05). The spondylolisthesis rate, spondylolisthesis angle and JOA score measured at the last follow-up were better than those before treatment, and the differences between the measured indicators at each time point and the preoperative indicators were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Endoscopic interlaminar lumbar fusion can achieve sufficient nerve root decompression and interbody fusion on the basis of safety, and significantly improve the symptoms of low back pain and dysfunction caused by lumbar spondylolisthesis in patients, and the surgical effect is good.

参考文献/References:

[1] HARMS J, ROLINGER H. Die operative behandlung der spondylolisthese durch dorsale aufrichtung und ventrale verblockung[J]. Thieme E-Journals, 1982, 120(3): 343-347.[2] 朱本清,孙渊. 腰椎融合术的研究现状[J]. 实用骨科杂志,2013,19(7): 622-624.[3] FAN S W, HU Z J, FANG X Q, et al. Comparison of paraspinal muscle injury in one-level lumbar posterior inter-body fusion: modified minimally invasive and traditional open approaches[J]. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2010, 2(3): 194-200.[4] COLE C D, MCCALL T D, SCHMIDT M H, et al. Comparison of low back fusion techniques: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches[J]. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2009, 2(2): 118-126.[5] 韩振川,任博文,刘庆祖,等. 经皮脊柱内镜腰椎微创融合术的临床研究进展[J]. 解放军医学院学报,2021,42(9): 970-973,987.[6] OSMAN S G. Endoscopic transforaminal decompression, interbody fusion, and percutaneous pedicle screw implantation of the lumbar spine: A case series report[J]. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 2012, 6(1): 157-166.[7] JIN M, ZHANG J, SHAO H, et al. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: A consecutive case series with mean 2-year follow-up[J]. Pain Physician. 2020, 23(2): 165-174.[8] 侯平选. 不同复位程度对腰椎滑脱症患者临床疗效的影响[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志,2018,50(9): 1066-1067.[9] 刘大凯,王罡,易东升. 腰椎滑脱不同复位程度对临床疗效的影响[J]. 当代医学,2017,23(27): 51-52.[10] 苏江平,井万里. 腰椎滑脱部分与完全复位术后临床效果比较[J]. 中国药物与临床,2016,16(8): 1195-1196.[11] KIM S K, KANG S S, HONG Y H, et al. Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis[J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2018, 13(1): 22.[12] 王辉,喻亮,康照利. 微创经椎间孔入路椎间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症[J]. 临床骨科杂志,2020,23(5): 622-625.[13] PHAN K, RAO P J, KAM A C, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: Systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. European Spine Journal. 2015, 24(5): 1017-1030.[14] SCHIZAS C, TZINIERS N, TSIRIDIS E, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience[J]. International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33(6): 1683-1688.[15] LEE K H, YEO W, SOEHARNO H, et al. Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF)[J]. Journal of Spinal Disordersand Techniques, 2014, 27(7): E234-E240.[16] HEO D H, SON S K, EUM J H, et al. Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results[J]. Neurosurgical Focus, 2017, 43(2): E8.[17] WU P H, KIM H S, JANG I T. A narrative review of development of full-endoscopic lumbar spine surgery[J]. Neurospine. 2020, 17(Suppl 1): S20-S33.[18] RUETTEN S, KOMP M, MERK H, et al. Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: A prospective, randomized, controlled study[J]. Journal of Neurosurgery, 2009, 10(5): 476-485.[19] RUETTEN S, KOMP M, MERK H, et al. Use of newly developed instruments and endoscopes: full-endoscopic resection of lumbar disc herniations via the interlaminar and lateral transforaminal approach[J]. Journal of Neurosurgery, 2007, 6(6): 521-530.[20] PARK M K, PARK S A, SON S K, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up[J]. Neurosurgical Review, 2019, 42(3): 753-761.[21] 农明普,蒙法科. 对比不同入路行椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术在腰椎间盘突出症中的治疗效果[J]. 现代医学与健康研究,2022,6(8): 56-59.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2022-08-24【基金项目】广西重点研发计划“基于精准医疗模式下多节段腰椎管狭窄症诊治方案规范化及示范研究”(桂科AB20159018)。【作者简介】李承蔚(1995-),男,广西中医药大学在读研究生,住院医师,研究方向为脊柱退行性疾病的中西医结合诊疗。【通信作者】李智斐(1980-),男,广西中医药大学第一附属医院主任医师,硕士,研究方向为脊柱退行性疾病的中西医结合诊疗。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-07