[1]陈丹丹 谭开亮 蒋 丽　覃锦燊.II型剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠两种方案疗效比较[J].大众科技,2022,24(12):99-102.
　Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Therapeutic Regimens for Type II Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J].Popular Science & Technology,2022,24(12):99-102.
点击复制

II型剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠 两种方案疗效比较()
分享到：

《大众科技》[ISSN:1008-1151/CN:45-1235/N]

卷:
24
期数:
2022年12
页码:
99-102
栏目:
医药与卫生
出版日期:
2022-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Therapeutic Regimens for Type II Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
作者:
陈丹丹1 谭开亮1 蒋 丽1　覃锦燊2
（1.广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院，广西 南宁 530022； 2.中国科技开发院广西分院，广西 南宁530022）
关键词:
剖宫产瘢妊娠; 清宫术; 子宫动脉栓塞术
Keywords:
cesaresan scar pregnancy curettage uterine artery embolizatio
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较II型剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠两种方案疗效，探讨II型剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠最佳治疗方案。方法：回顾性分析2019年1月至2020年12月在广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院妇科收治的45例II型剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠患者的临床治疗，根据所采用的治疗方式不同分为两组：A组采用B超引导下清宫术+宫腔球囊压迫（n=27例），B组采用子宫动脉栓塞术+B超引导下清宫术+宫腔球囊压迫（n=18例），观察比较两者术中出血量、术后第1天血清β-HCG下降比率、住院天数、住院费用、术后疼痛情况。结果：两组患者术中出血量及术后第1天血清β-HCG下降比率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。A组住院天数及住院费用均明显少于B组（P＜0.05）。B组疼痛发生率明显高于A组（P=0.02）。结论：B超引导下清宫术+宫腔球囊压迫及子宫动脉栓塞术+B超引导下清宫术+宫腔球囊压迫均为有效治疗方案，但对于血HCG＜30000 mIU/mL且孕囊最大直径＜3.0 cm的II型CSP患者，可考虑行B超引导下清宫术+宫腔球囊压迫的治疗方案。
Abstract:
Objective: To compare the efficacy of two therapeutic regimens for the patients with type II cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), and to explore the best therapeutic regimens for the patients with type II CSP. Methods: The clinical data of 45 patients with CSP who were admitted to Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region between 2019 to 2020 were retrospectivedly analyzed. These patients were divided into 2 groups according to the treatment menthods. Group A was treated with B-ultrasound-guided uterine debridement + uterine balloon compression (n=27 cases), and group B was treated with uterine artery embolization + B-ultrasound-guided uterine debridement + uterine balloon compression (n=18 cases). Intraoperative blood loss, the decrease rate of serum β-HCG on the first day after surgery, length of stay, hospitalization cost and postoperative pain were observed and compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and the decline rate of blood β-HCG on the first postoperative day between the 2 groups (P＞0.05). The length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses in group A were significantly less than those in group B (P＞0.05). The incidence of pain in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P=0.02). Conclusion: B-ultrasound-guided uterine debridement + uterine balloon compression and uterine artery embolization + B-ultrasound-guided uterine debridement + uterine balloon compression are effective treatment options. However, the treatment scheme of B-ultrasound-guided uterine debridement + uterine balloon compression can be considered for type II CSP patients with blood HCG < 30000 mIU/mL and maximum diameter of gestational sac <3.0 cm.

参考文献/References:

[1]　谢幸，孔北华. 妇产科学(第9版)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社，2018. [2]　何双，顾向应. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的发病率及发病原因分析[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科，2013，5(4): 15-16，23. [3]　中华医学会妇产科学分会计划生育学组. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志，2016，15(1): 5-9. [4]　LITWICKA K, GRECO E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options[J]. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013, 25(6): 456-461. [5]　SEOW K M, HUANG L W, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management[J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004, 23(3): 247-253. [6] 纪培兰. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠29例临床分析[J]. 中国实用医药，2018，13(4): 47-49. [7]　陈雯，胡琼. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠相关因素分析[D]. 贵州，遵义医学院，2017. [8]　张新悦，张宁宁，王丹丹，等. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠再发生相关因素的分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展，2021，30(2): 125-128. [9]　ROTAS M A, HABERMAN S, LEVGUR M, et al. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies etiology, diagnosis and management[J]. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006, 107(6): 1373-1381. [10] 陈路萍，张永清，陈利青，等. 子宫动脉栓塞术在剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠中的应用[J]. 中华医学杂志，2019，99(23): 1838-1840. [10] 祁波，李修敏，徐华晓，等. 子宫动脉栓塞术治疗瘢痕妊娠疗效及对患者卵巢储备功能、妊娠结局影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志，2021，29(8): 1677-1680. [12] MARCUS S, CHENG E, GOFF B. Extrauterine pregnancy resulting from early uterine rupture[J]. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999, 94: 804-805. [13] PARELKAR S V, MUNDADA D, SANGHVI B V, et al. Should the ovary always be conserved in torsion? A tertiary care institute experience[J]. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2014, 49(3): 465-468. [14] TAN K L, CHEN Y M, ZENG W, et al. Local methotrexate injection followed by dilation and curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy: A prospective non-randomized stud[J]. Frontiers of Medicine, 2022, 21(8): 800610. [15] 范雪梅，邱成丽，石晓燕，等. 高强度聚焦超声联合宫腔镜手术治疗内生型切口妊娠的疗效分析[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科，2021，13(11): 87-90，96.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2022-09-24 【基金项目】广西壮族自治区卫生和计划生育委员会自筹经费科研课题（Z20170769）。 【作者简介】陈丹丹（1988－），女，广西玉林人，广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院妇科医生，硕士，研究方向为妇科肿瘤、普通妇科相关疾病等。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-21