[1]赵敏艳.宫颈癌放疗后危险因素分析及干预效果评价[J].大众科技,2022,24(03):102-105.
　Risk Factors Analysis and Intervention Effect Evaluation of Cervical Cancer after Radiotherapy[J].Popular Science & Technology,2022,24(03):102-105.
点击复制

宫颈癌放疗后危险因素分析及干预效果评价()
分享到：

《大众科技》[ISSN:1008-1151/CN:45-1235/N]

卷:
24
期数:
2022年03
页码:
102-105
栏目:
医药与卫生
出版日期:
2022-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk Factors Analysis and Intervention Effect Evaluation of Cervical Cancer after Radiotherapy
作者:
赵敏艳　
（全州县人民医院，广西 桂林 541500）
关键词:
宫颈癌放疗; 危险因素分析; 干预效果评价
Keywords:
radiotherapy for cervical cancer risk factor analysis intervention effect evaluation
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：研究宫颈癌放疗后危险因素分析及干预效果评价。方法：选取全州县人民医院于2019年6月至2021年6月收治的80例宫颈癌患者，分析放疗危险因素，并随机分为对照组和观察组，对照组给予常规护理干预，观察组在对照组基础之上使用优质护理干预，记录并比较两组患者护理前后生活质量情况、护理前后心理状态情况及护理效果满意度情况。结果：观察组护理后生理职能、社会功能及精神健康维度评分均高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组护理后SAS量表以及SDS量表评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组患者护理满意度（100.00%）相对高于对照组（85.00%）（P＜0.05）。结论：分析宫颈癌放疗后危险因素，进而找出有针对性的护理措施，采用优质护理方法，可有效提升患者的生活质量及心理状态，护理后的患者满意度高，具有很强临床护理意义。
Abstract:
Objective: To study the risk factors analysis and intervention effect evaluation of cervical cancer after radiotherapy. Methods: 80 patients with cervical cancer treated in Quanzhou Peoples Hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 were selected to analyze the risk factors of radiotherapy, and were randomly divided into control group and observation group. The control group was given routine nursing intervention, and the observation group used high-quality nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The quality of life, psychological status and satisfaction of nursing effect were recorded and compared between the two groups before and after nursing. Results: The scores of physiological function, social function and mental health in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05) the scores of SAS and SDS in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05) the nursing satisfaction of patients in the observation group (100.00%) was relatively higher than that in the control group (85.00%) (P<0.05). Conclusion: Analyze the risk factors of cervical cancer after radiotherapy, and then find out targeted nursing measures. The use of high-quality nursing methods can effectively improve the quality of life and psychological state of patients. The patient satisfaction after nursing is high, which has strong clinical nursing significance.

参考文献/References:

[1] 季亚洁. 循证护理对宫颈癌术后放疗患者生活质量的影响分析[J]. 饮食保健，2021(30): 211-212. [2] 吕婧豪. 循证护理对宫颈癌术后放疗患者生活质量的影响[J]. 黑龙江医学，2021，45(4): 406-408. [3] 刘红玲. 预见性护理在宫颈癌三维腔内后装放疗患者中的应用体会及效果分析[J]. 家有孕宝，2021，3(11): 57. [4] 葛晓霞. 临床护理路径对宫颈癌腔内后装放疗患者治疗依从性与临床疗效的影响分析[J]. 医药前沿，2020，10(19): 153-154. [5] 石思梅，唐雪苗，黄雯薏. 宫颈癌放疗后患者生活质量的影响因素与护理对策[J]. 护理实践与研究，2019，16(16): 20-22. [6] 郭志平. 宫颈癌新辅助化疗临床应用及预后影响因素[J]. 中国保健营养，2021，31(2): 109. [7] 罗丹，孔为民，陈姝宁. 宫颈癌放疗后放射性直肠炎发生情况及其相关因素分析[J]. 医学综述，2021，27(2): 400-403. [8] 骆华春，傅志超，王凤玫，等. 宫颈癌根治性放化疗预后的影响因素分析[J]. 现代肿瘤医学，2020，28(19): 3395-3398. [9] 谢绍菊，张仟仕，李乔，等. 宫颈癌放化疗患者的生存率及其影响因素分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志，2020，35(3): 464-467. [10] 臧建新. 老年Ⅰb～Ⅱa期宫颈癌术后放疗后复发的危险因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志，2019，39(10): 2372-2374.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2022-01-04 【作者简介】赵敏艳（1985－），女，广西全州人，全州县人民医院主管护师，从事妇产科护理相关工作。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-06-21