[1]覃 翔.广西沿海城市海洋气象灾害区域脆弱性空间特征与评价[J].大众科技,2020,22(01):20-23.
　Spatial Characteristics and Evaluation of Regional Vulnerability of MarineMeteorological Disasters in Coastal Cities of Guangxi[J].Popular Science & Technology,2020,22(01):20-23.
点击复制

广西沿海城市海洋气象灾害区域脆弱性空间特征与评价()
分享到：

《大众科技》[ISSN:1008-1151/CN:45-1235/N]

卷:
22
期数:
2020年01
页码:
20-23
栏目:
资源与环境
出版日期:
2020-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial Characteristics and Evaluation of Regional Vulnerability of MarineMeteorological Disasters in Coastal Cities of Guangxi
作者:
覃 翔
（南宁师范大学，广西 南宁 530001）
关键词:
HOP 模型; 区域脆弱性; 海洋气象灾害; 北部湾沿海
Keywords:
hazard-of-place model;  regional vulnerability;  marine meteorological disaster;  Beibu Gulf
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
文章在采用 HOP（Hazard of Place）模型和主成分分析法的基础上，以广西北部湾沿海三市为例，根据《广西海洋环境状况公报》、年鉴等资料对广西北部湾沿海三市的人口分布，海洋气象灾害暴露水平，社会脆弱性及其特征，区域脆弱性进行分析。研究结果表明：海洋气象灾害暴露水平由地理位置，岸线长度决定，区域脆弱性主要受灾害暴露水平控制，也受社会脆弱性制约。防治海洋气象灾害重点应集中于经济发展、基础设施建设，提高社会保障机制。从规划角度分析，沿海大至县区，小到乡镇街道来看，在设置相应功能区时，需要考虑海洋气象灾害会对设置区域的损害，综合比较防治、资产和人员三者的关系后才能设置较为合理的功能区。
Abstract:
Based on the Hazard of Place (HOP) model and principal component analysis, taking the three cities along the northerncoast of the Beibu Gulf as examples, the population distribution, the marine meteorological disaster exposure level, the social fragility andits characteristics, and the regional vulnerability are analyzed according to the "Marine Environment Status Bulletin" and yearbook. Theresults show that the exposure level of marine meteorological disasters is determined by geographical location and the length of coastline,and the regional vulnerability is mainly controlled by exposure level of disasters, and also restricted by social vulnerability. The preventionand control of marine meteorological disasters should focus on economic development, infrastructure construction and improving socialsecurity mechanisms. From the point of view of planning, when setting up the corresponding functional areas, it is necessary to consider thedamage of marine meteorological disasters to the setting areas. Only after comprehensive comparison of the relationship betweenprevention and control, assets and personnel, can a more reasonable functional area be set up.

参考文献/References:

[1] 肖金成，欧阳慧. 优化国土空间开发格局研究[J]. 经济学动态，2012(5): 20-25.[2] 文超祥，刘健枭. 基于陆海统筹的海岸带空间规划研究综述与展望[J]. 规划师，2019，35(7): 7-13.[3] 陈春亮，梁春林，孙省利. 基于生态环境脆弱的海岸带承载力评价研究——以雷州半岛为例[J]. 海洋开发与管理，2014，31(6): 88-95.[4] 李宇亮，王豪伟，邓红兵，等. 城市规划区地质灾害易损性评价[J]. 环境科学与技术，2014，1(S2): 526-529.[5] 巫丽芸，何东进，洪伟，等. 自然灾害风险评估与灾害易损性研究进展[J]. 灾害学，2014(4): 129-135.[6] 顾春杰，孙爽，宁娜，等. 基于生产函数的区域泥石流灾害易损性研究[J]. 山地学报，2015，33(3)：303-310.[7] 张玉红，刘强. 风暴潮灾害易损性风险区划的建模及应用[C]//. 全国工程地质大论文集. 北京: 《工程地质学报》编辑部，2012.[8] 杨俊，向华丽. 基于 HOP 模型的地质灾害区域脆弱性研究——以湖北省宜昌地区为例[J]. 灾害学，2014(3): 131-138.[9] Cutter S L, Boruff B J, Shirley W L. Social vulnerability toenvironmental hazards[J]. Social Science Quarterly, 2003,84(2) : 242-261．[10] Wood N J, Burton C G, Cutter S L. Community variations insocial vulnerability to Cascadia-related tsunamis in the U.S.Pacific Northwest[J]. Natural Hazards, 2010, 52(2):369-389.[11] Burton C．Social vulnerability and hurricane impactmodeling[J]. Natural Hazards Review, 2010,11(2): 58-68．[12] Zebardast E . Constructing a social vulnerability index toearthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis andanalytic network process (F’ANP) model[J]. NaturalHazards, 2013, 65(3): 1331-1359.[13] Saarinen T F, Hewitt K, Burton I . The hazardousness of aplace: a regional ecology of damaging events[J].Geographical Review, 1973, 63(1): 134.[14] Cutter S L, Scott M M S. Revealing the vulnerability ofpeople and places: a case study of Georgetown county,south Carolina[J]. Annals of the Association of AmericanGeographers, 2000, 90(4): 713-737.[15] Bartels D. The Hazardousness of a Place: a regional ecologyof damaging events[J]. Geographische Zeitschrift, 61(4):325-326.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2019-11-05【作者简介】覃翔（1993－），男，南宁师范大学自然资源与测绘学院在读硕士研究生，研究方向为空间规划。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-20